FIP Web Sites Competition 2000

A Short Critique of the Critique

      Four months ago the Paintings and Arts Internet Site was awarded the 3-Stars FIP Award. One can say that the webmaster should be happy, and actually he was satisfied. But he wasn't satisfied, because from the very beginning FIP has promised to each participant a critique of her/his site, and this one not only came late, but has shown some problems related to the quality of jury's work .

     This critique was important to me, especially when coming from a FIP panel of judges. Yesterday (I underline it, after 4 months) I have received the critique I was looking forward, accompanied with excuses. Please take a look at the critique that I have got (in Navy) and at my comments and thoughts (in Blue).

    There are some drawbacks.
     V.M. I notice that the jury has already started with the drawbacks, quite quickly, after only 11 words for the general statement. 11 words is not very much, therefore no wonder that things that could be considered important have been overseen, like the Paintings and Arts on Stamps Internet Club, counting at that time about 200 members, or a Club Forum. Is this unimportant, considering that PASIC is one of the oldest philatelic clubs on the Internet? Or have the judges totally other criteria in judging a philatelic site, as compared with mines? And what about the extensive Art Gallery, presenting, among others, treasures from world's most renown museums, an important chapter that wasn't even mentioned? 

    The viewer gets only the examples of paintings that the site owner decides he will show.   
     V.M. This is maybe the most "challenging" statement. Unfortunately the intentions of the honorable judges are not clear. Should the webmaster ask others what should he display on his home page? Or should he show stamps that he hasn't? Or, even better, should the examples of stamps be decided by the viewers? Actually, this last possibility is offered through the many choices from the menu. I wonder also which is the the difference in this respect between the philatelic stamp competitions and those of philatelic Web sites. Can a visitor of a philatelic exhibition decide what a given exhibitor will show? My experience as visitor tells me the contrary.

     We looked for the Hosukai and Hiroshige paintings on Japanese stamps, but instead got images of a few of their paintings on stamps of other countries. Same with some other artists.    
     V.M. Hokusai, of course (I wouldn't mention it, but a year ago another FIP jury wrote me in about 20 words, of a total of maybe 50 (!), about a misspelled name on my site: Boticelli, with one "t" instead of two). On my introductory page to the Countries paintings, I have written:  "The pages with the subject Countries show the  achievements in arts of masters of different countries and cultures, as reflected on the postal stamps of the respective territories and of other territorial units." Obviously this introductory page has been overseen. Or do the judges discriminate against certain philatelic issues, even if they are accepted by the UPU? BTW, the judges have obviously overseen other 3 pages, full of painting stamps issued only by the Japanese P.A.

    The scanned images are all quite good, and he does include selections from a wide variety of artists and countries.  The excel database should be useful to the paintings collector.
     V.M. Thanks! I see no drawbacks in the above statement. Therefore these apparent drawbacks are rather related to the structure of the whole document, possibly written very quickly. Judging after the reactions that I have had from the Web philatelic world (some of feedback being also presented on my site), "database should be useful" is, IMHO, not a very clear statement. Just to notice that the creation of this database took an enormous time (years of quite intense work of several participants).